Sunday, May 13, 2012

Remembering the Mother's who have lost their children


Today, Mother's Day, is a sad time to remember all the women who were mothers and lost their children. Accident, sickness, war - the world is full of grieving in many women's hearts because of circumstances out of their control. It is even more tragic to think about the mothers who are grieving because they have killed their own children. Through ignorance, fear and selfishness, women are being supported in their decisions to choose their own lives over the lives of their children, to the point of death. These women need to be remembered also, with love, because the deep trauma to their hearts and souls is more than we can even imagine. 

Unfortunately there are people out there who not only embrace this selfish murder, but are so ignorant as to misrepresent it; painting a pretty white-picket-fence picture of a couple who were "saved" from the terrible prospect of raising the child they brought into this world. They embrace a decision to value finance and culture comfort over human life. Perhaps it is a terrible world to be raised in, full of suffering and pain. But who we are to judge what a persons life will be?  I for one am grateful to be alive. And if my mother, or anyone, decides that I am too much of an inconvenience, I will certainly fight for my life. The innocents, the unborn children, they need us to fight for theirs. 

I copied (below) an article in the Chronicle Herald that was published today. It is about a women and a man and a baby who wasn't born, but there is little truth in it beyond the selfishness it portrays. 

Have a read, and leave a comment. I added a beautiful excerpt of a speech by Mother Theresa after.

And to my mom:  I love you.  Thank you, for the sacrifices you made that I could live. I pray that I am able to be as loving and giving someday to my children, as you have done for me.  You have set an example of faith and beauty in this world, may we all have to grace to do the same.

<>< L



Original Article:  http://thechronicleherald.ca/opinion/95186-lowe-a-day-to-be-thankful-for-abortion-access

My friend, Linda, might sleep in this Sunday. Maybe garden. Maybe run. She’ll fritter away the day in just the way she wants.
Linda won’t be ticking off her Mother’s Day blessings surrounded by the contented chaos of children.
She’ll be happy, instead, that she had an abortion in 2007. She’ll be celebrating Mother’s Day with the knowledge that she’s not a mom and, given her druthers, never will be.
And I’ll be happy, too, eating burnt toast and wet eggs and receiving hand-drawn cards and knowing this: access to safe abortion makes Mother’s Day all the more special.
“It was the right choice,” Linda says. “It was, in no way, the wrong choice.”
Linda had been married for a little less than a year when her birth control failed. She and her husband were carrying debt; he is an entrepreneur who is away a lot; she’s the primary earner. They have no family in town.
“And more than that,” she says, “I have always been ambivalent (about having kids.)”
Once she pieced together the missing period, weird-feeling body and mood swings, she peed on a stick, swallowed the meaning of the two little lines staring up at her and shuffled downstairs to deliver the news to her husband.
“The look on his face was not joy,” she says, “but devastation and confusion. And I realized it mirrored what I felt. That it was not right. Not for us, not for me, not for him.”
Canada’s abortion laws were struck down two decades ago, but there remain perennial challenges to accessing the procedure, from Conservative backbenchers putting forward pie-in-the sky anti-choice private member’s motions to last month’s pre-emptive cancellation of abortions at Capital Health because of the anticipated strike.
Ninety per cent of Nova Scotia women who receive abortions receive them in Halifax. Many travel. On Prince Edward Island, there’s no access to abortion whatsoever. It shouldn’t be this difficult to end an unwanted pregnancy.
Linda was nervous about how her physician might respond to a request for an abortion referral.
“Turns out, my doctor is one of three in Nova Scotia who performs abortions. So, it was easy. I didn’t have to struggle at all. She was so helpful and compassionate.”
Four weeks later, it was a merciful memory.
“The next day, I swung my legs out of bed,” she says. “For the first time in weeks I just felt free.”
Linda hasn’t told many people about her abortion. And that’s why Linda isn’t her real name in this column.
“No one talks about this,” she says. “There are so many abortion stories. And they are not what people think they are. It’s not just sluts who aren’t using birth control, which is the prevailing attitude. That is not the reality.”
The couple has never second-guessed their choice. Linda laughs that when she and her husband visit friends with kids, they quietly high-five on the way out the door.
“I didn’t have a moment of regret,” she says. “I didn’t have a moment of ‘what might have been.’ ”
What might have been, after all, is a fool’s chase. So let’s talk about what is. Let’s talk about Mother’s Day, why don’t we? Because if there’s any day to be thankful for abortion access, that’s the one. That’s what I’ll think about when I’m woken way too early by wiggling weasels crawling on the bed to wish me a Happy Mother’s Day.
And when Linda wakes, late?
“I will spend a few moments acknowledging that the choice my husband and I made was without question,” she says, “the right one for us.”
Lezlie Lowe is a freelance writer in Halifax. Follow her on Twitter @lezlielowe.

About the Author






I’m going to guess that this journalist has never actually spoken to a woman who has gone through the heart-wrenching, soul shattering realization that she has killed her child. Even for the people who dis-illusion themselves that it is “okay”, it is never “easy”.


I found a talk by Mother Theresa, on abortion.  Here is the link:
 
 http://www.priestsforlife.org/brochures/mtspeech.html
 
and an excerpt. Her words are so true.  Read/listen. She will touch your heart.


Speech of Mother Teresa of Calcutta to the National Prayer Breakfast, Washington, DC, February 3, 1994

 (An excerpt)
...
But I feel that the greatest destroyer of peace today is abortion, because it is a war against the child, a direct killing of the innocent child, murder by the mother herself.

And if we accept that a mother can kill even her own child, how can we tell other people not to kill one another? How do we persuade a woman not to have an abortion? As always, we must persuade her with love and we remind ourselves that love means to be willing to give until it hurts. Jesus gave even His life to love us. So, the mother who is thinking of abortion, should be helped to love, that is, to give until it hurts her plans, or her free time, to respect the life of her child. The father of that child, whoever he is, must also give until it hurts.

By abortion, the mother does not learn to love, but kills even her own child to solve her problems.
And, by abortion, the father is told that he does not have to take any responsibility at all for the child he has brought into the world. That father is likely to put other women into the same trouble. So abortion just leads to more abortion.

Any country that accepts abortion is not teaching its people to love, but to use any violence to get what they want. This is why the greatest destroyer of love and peace is abortion.
Many people are very, very concerned with the children of India, with the children of Africa where quite a few die of hunger, and so on. Many people are also concerned about all the violence in this great country of the United States. These concerns are very good. But often these same people are not concerned with the millions who are being killed by the deliberate decision of their own mothers. And this is what is the greatest destroyer of peace today - abortion which brings people to such blindness.

And for this I appeal in India and I appeal everywhere - "Let us bring the child back." The child is God's gift to the family. Each child is created in the special image and likeness of God for greater things - to love and to be loved. In this year of the family we must bring the child back to the center of our care and concern. This is the only way that our world can survive because our children are the only hope for the future. As older people are called to God, only their children can take their places.
But what does God say to us? He says: "Even if a mother could forget her child, I will not forget you. I have carved you in the palm of my hand." We are carved in the palm of His hand; that unborn child has been carved in the hand of God from conception and is called by God to love and to be loved, not only now in this life, but forever. God can never forget us.


Thursday, May 10, 2012

Supporting CBC and the beautiful things that Canada represents

Private companies are getting mad because Canada supports FREE ARTS... This made me really frustrated, especially after the recent CBC funding cuts. I thought I'd share this on here so I would have a copy of the letter and, who knows, maybe I'll reach someone else randomly and inspire them to stand up for one of the wonderful things about Canada and the culture of Canadians. We can take action by submitting a letter of complaint to the CRTC. At the bottom is the CBC letter to listeners/reader, for more information. Or follow the link.

I sent in my support, everyone else needs to also. CBC is a national treasure, supporting Canadian music and promoting our rich culture and heritage to the world. Saying that CBC is unfairly funded to compete with private companies is like saying that the libraries are unfairly funded to compete with private bookstores.  
Here is my comment letter:


To the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission,

I strongly oppose the complaint by Stingray Digital Group Inc. (Application #: 2012-0447-9)

My name is Laura Albrecht; I am 28 and a proud Canadian citizen. I listen to CBC Radio (on the radio) in the morning and evenings. During the day at work I plug my earphones in and listen (online) to whatever is offered via the CBC website. I have come to know and love an incredible variety of Canadian music solely because of my CBC radio access. I have also come to know and love the radio personalities that share this music with me. The accessibility of the music as well as the rich history that is offered with it make this service a unique opportunity for Canadians to share in their cultural musical heritage. This is a service that is inherently different from that offered by private companies, and has long been supported by public interest and funding. I would like to highlight the fact that my commitment to CBC was present before the introduction of the online CBC Music program.

Not only does CBC promote and support predominantly Canadian artists via sharing their music, they also influence the listener’s entertainment purchases towards these Canadian artists: I will pay to see a small (or big) band in concert because I heard them on CBC; I will travel to a music store to purchase a new record because I heard about it on CBC; I will influence my friends and colleagues to support the Canadian arts, because of the passion that comes through to me from the CBC. What I will not choose to do is to pay for a subscription to a private company for the highly profit-controlled selection of the music they offer. There is already a large amount of “mainstream” music available for free from resources such as international radio stations and Youtube.com. CBC offers so much more than just “online music”. I come to CBC because it offers something different and because I believe in supporting my country’s interests.

In the changing environment of media accessibility, it is imperative that CBC remains relevant and available to its listeners. If part of this solution is the CBC Music approach, then we should be applauding the forward thinking efforts, not blocking the way. Part of the beauty of the CBC is that it is freely available to all Canadians and that its focus is to be a service to Canadians. Saying that CBC is unfairly funded to compete with private companies is like saying that the libraries are unfairly funded to compete with private bookstores.

I believe that CBC offers something incredibly unique to Canada. We should be proud that we have such a national treasure and that the tax dollars we spend in this country go towards the support of these resources.

I would like to conclude in saying that any company that opposes the national freedoms and pleasures that we support as Canadians, because of a profit margin, is certainly not going to receive my business.

Sincerely,
Laura Albrecht


From CBC:

CBC Music
music.cbc.ca
 
Dear CBC Music fans…

We want to take this opportunity first of all, to thank you. We launched CBC Music just over 2 months ago, with the goal of better serving the musical needs of Canadians, and the support from both artists and fans has been overwhelming.

We can’t tell you how much we’ve appreciated all of your positive e-mails, tweets, Facebook and blog posts --- it lets us know that all of the hard work that went in to CBC Music has paid off and that you appreciate our efforts to give you the music (and stories behind it) you want, when you want it, on your desktop, laptop, mobile phone and on traditional radio. So thank you.

By now, you’ve probably read some of the stories that have been circulating regarding an application against CBC Music lodged with the CRTC, Canada’s broadcast regulator, by a private company. In their application they allege that CBC Music is somehow harmful to the competitive market for online music services, including their own online subscription service, due to what they claim is a “preferential” rights payment structure and the fact that we receive funding from the government which helps to partially fund our service. Their application asks the CRTC to order CBC to either shut down the CBC Music service or to substantially modify it.

When we look at the specific concerns they raise, there are a few things that we want to clarify, and as we move forward we’d like to ask you to lend your voice to the next step of the CRTC process.
First off, CBC Music does not receive any preferential treatment when we negotiate our rights deals. Just like everyone else, the nature of the services we offer are examined (either by the Copyright Board or the party we are negotiating with) and then rates are set - or negotiated - accordingly.
On the question of whether CBC Music should be “competing” in the same space as private broadcasters, I think it’s safe to say that each one of you knows CBC Music does not exist to compete, it exists to serve; Canadians, musicians and our cultural community.  

We will be submitting a comprehensive response to the CRTC by May 17th and, that’s where you come in.
We think it’s important that Canadian artists, music labels and the people who use CBC Music every day write to the CRTC and tell them what they think about CBC Music -- whether it be:

1)     The distinctiveness of the service (no other service features such a wide range of editorial content and context along with music);
2)    The importance of CBC Music in showcasing and promoting Canadian artists;
3)    The role we play in the Canadian music ecosystem; and
4)    The benefit of having Canadian music showcased alongside major artists from around the world.
If you are interested in submitting a comment to the CRTC on the Stingray application, you can do so by visiting the following website: https://services.crtc.gc.ca/pub/Intervention/Submission-Soumission.aspx?lang=e&EN=201204479&ET=A#SE0 (follow the steps and click Option 1, Submit an intervention/comment) before May 17th 2012.

One important thing to note, is that if you are submitting in support of CBC Music, you would be submitting comments in opposition to Stingray’s application (click the word “opposition” that you’ll see on your screen). Also, please ensure that Stingray (rbraide@stingraydigital.com) and CBC (RegulatoryAffairs@cbc.ca) are copied on your submission.

If you have any questions on how to submit a comment, please refer to http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/info_sht/g4.htm on the CRTC website, or contact Raj Shoan in Regulatory Affairs at the CBC at raj.shoan@cbc.ca.
We want to thank you for your ongoing support of CBC and specifically for CBC Music over the last few months, it’s truly meant a lot to each of us and our teams. Lending your voice to this process would be both greatly appreciated by us, and would help further bolster the strong case we’ll be making to the commission.

Sincerely,

Chris, Mark & Steve

Chris Boyce
Executive Director, Radio & Audio at CBC
Mark Steinmetz
Director, Music Programming, CBC Music
Steve Pratt
Director, Digital Music, CBC Music 
posted by Steve Pratt on May 07, 2012